POLICE WATCH
PUBLIC PLACED ON RED ALERT

MERSEYSIDE POLICE PLANT
EVIDENCE ON CHILD

Merseyside Police have been ordered to pay £11,000 compensation to a fifteen year old child after the arresting officer was found guilty of malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and wrongful arrest.

Paul Keoghan, then just thirteen years old, was arrested for being ‘equipped for theft’ after being found with a screwdriver in his pocket. PC Victor O’Rourke stopped the child after receiving a phone call about youngsters ‘behaving suspiciously’ in the area. Handcuffing the child, he drove him to a nearby sports centre, went to the boot of his car, and took out a screwdriver, which he then placed in the boy’s trouser pocket.

Joined later by two other constables, PC Adrian Smith and PC David Manning, both told the court they had witnessed the screwdriver being found on the boy - when he was first stopped on the street. CCTV footage that would have shown PC O’Rourke getting the screwdriver from his car boot had mysteriously vanished.

The child’s father, Paul Keoghan, later said: "We just wanted to clear his name, that was the real aim. The behaviour of Merseyside Police was scandalous." Merseyside Police refused to comment!

POLICE AND GRANADA TV ARRANGE ‘STEVE LAWRENCE FIVE’ SCAM

Even after they were acquitted of the 1993 murder of Negro Stephen Lawrence, the Metropolitan Police bugged the five accused young men as they prepared for a television interview with coloured interviewer Martin Bashir on the Granada Tonight TV programme presented by coloured presenter, Trevor McDonald.

Knowing the youths would discuss their defence in the privacy of their hotel rooms and on the open golf course Assistant Chief Constable John Grieve authorised the bugging operation.

In this highly questionable underhanded denial of civil liberties, Scotland Yard arranged for a police helicopter to hover over the group as they played golf. The youths’ conversations were then recorded and relayed via satellite from tiny microphones that had been hidden in their golf trolleys.

THE IMMIGRANTS RAPID RESPONSE UNIT

Bedrooms and other pre-selected rooms in the hotel where the five teenagers were staying as ‘guests’ of Granada TV were also extensively bugged. Even their TV-supplied chauffeur driven car was bugged.

This Soviet-style persecution was authorised by John Grieve, the notorious head of Scotland Yard’s so-called ‘Racial and Violent Crime Task Force’. His unit is often described as the immigrants own rapid response unit.

With a strong whiff of threat one of Grieve’s henchmen afterwards boasted: "The information gleaned was very good indeed and quite surprising in its content. It will be very useful in the future.’

Mindful of the fact that a number of television companies have been exposed for setting up similar scams, Granada Television denied that it had took any part in the Lawrence Five scam. There was no comment from Martin Bashir.

White people campaigning for equality with Britain’s coloured population are now being urged to be on their guard against criminal and quasi-legal activity by the police who are increasingly described as being similar to East Germany’s secret police, the dreaded Stasi.

STATE TELEVISION - JUST LIKE SLOBOVAN MILOSEVIC’S

Tony Blair’s hijack of the Holocaust included control of the BBC’s radio and television coverage of the ghoulish gala. Holocaust Memorial Day producer Daniel Brittain-Catlin admitted he worked on behalf of The Home Office (similar to the Moscow’s Lubianka KGB HQ) ‘who have retained overall editorial control."

QUOTE: "Too many BBC journalists are falling into the lazy and cowardly ways of media groupies in a one-party state." - Stephen Glover, Daily Mail

POLICE ARREST MUM FOR DEFENDING HERSELF

Sharon Lightfoot, a respectable mum, harassed by aggressive beggars ‘singing carols’ told them to clear off. One of them, a teenager turned around, dropping his trousers and bending over he bared his naked backside at her.

Outraged at the indecency and insult the housewife threw the dregs of her barely warm coffee over the thug. Guess who got arrested and taken to the police station? You guessed it, Mrs. Sharon Lightfoot.

A commentator explains: "This seems to typify our system of justice in general and policing in particular. Predictably, as soon as the ‘child’ involved in this ludicrous story had gone whining to his mum or whoever, the wheels of officialdom ground into motion.

Anyone who knows anything about the police service today will tell you that bean counting is everything; if an activity cannot be measured, it is worthless. Arrests are encouraged so that the Home Secretary can report ever improving performance . . . easy arrests such as Mrs. Lightfoot are meat and drink to officers under pressure to achieve a quota. A case of never mind the quality, feel the collar."

POLICE SCREW UP ON CHILD VIOLATION EVIDENCE

Only when a grandfather confessed on national TV to sexually abusing his stepdaughters did the Police finally show serious interest in a 71-year old paedophile and pimp. It has been belatedly revealed that the police had investigated the man, who had previous convictions, but the Crown Prosecution Service had offered no evidence to proceed due to the police having failed to properly investigate the evidence.

Karen, one of the now mature abused daughters, had confronted her grandfather about the years of sexual terrorism she and her sisters had endured. Unknown to him she was tape-recording his boastful admissions. Attaching the tape to a long statement detailing the abuse she and her sisters had suffered at his and his ‘friends’ hands she sent it to the police who ‘investigated’ for ten months. The findings were so inept that the Crown Prosecution Service felt there was insufficient evidence to proceed.

Karen told reporters that she was three or maybe four-years old when the abuse began. Later she described how she and her sisters, Angela and Sandra, were ‘sold on’ for cash and whisky. Their stepfather frequently dropped them off at clients’ homes, picking them up later after they had been abused.

Member of Parliament Frank Field has raised questions in the House of Commons over the police handling of the case and called for an inquiry into why no action was taken to curb the pervert’s tastes for children.

RAPING THE MENTALLY ILL IS OKAY!

A landmark case has highlighted the Police and Crown Prosecution Service reluctance to prosecute where the victim of rape has a mental disorder; the theory is that their evidence is suspect. This policy gives the green light for rapists and perverts to target the mentally deficient.

The case centres on the conviction of John Archibald, 29, who entered a nursing home as a visitor, and attacked a mentally handicapped patient. The lady’s husband, an award winning television presenter, had placed his wife there when she reached the fourth stage of the five-stage degenerative Huntingdon’s Disease.

Three weeks later following a telephone call he dashed to the nursing home where he was told that John Archibald, with his brother Mark Archibald, (let off on a technicality) both bare-knuckle boxers from a local gypsy site, had dragged the elderly victim into a spare bedroom where she was brutally groped and raped.

The Crown Prosecution Service refused to bring charges, believing that the evidence would not be strong enough as the victim was suffering from a mental disorder. The aggrieved husband said: "I believe she was singled out because she was vulnerable, she couldn’t fight back and because they thought no one would believe her as she was disabled".

He described how he had to fight the CPS ‘tooth and nail’ and said, ‘it was only thanks to my legal knowledge that I was able to do that. Many people would have been too intimidated.

POLICE AND NATIONAL NEWSPAPER CONSPIRE TO IMPRISON AN INNOCENT MAN

Two key witnesses against Michael Stone the man convicted of murdering mother and daughter Lin and Megan Russell, were paid police informants, it has been claimed.

One of the witnesses, who both told the jury that Stone confessed to the killings while in prison, said they had lied and had been in the pay of the Kent police.

Barry Thompson, police informer, had acted as a police witness at the 1998 Maidstone Crown Court. He admitted to a national newspaper that his testimony was a pack of lies. Another police informer witness, Mark Jennings, had told the Maidstone Crown Court jury that he heard a confession from Stone. But it later emerged that he had been paid £5,000 by a national newspaper with the promise of a further £10,000 if Stone was convicted.

Jennings, now ashamed of his part in sending an innocenr man to gaol said: "I didn’t believe it in the first place. I never thought he’d done it. The evidence proves it. There was nothing to point he’s done it. Nothing at all." – Daily Mail, January 29, 2001

Meanwhile the monster who bludgeoned the child and her mother to death runs free while an innocent man languishes in prison; arrested, put on trial, gaoled for life on the lying evidence of two police informers, one of whom was promised £10,000 if the innocent man was found guilty. If that is not catastrophic corruption then what is? All to boost police clear-up rates and a newspaper’s circulation.

POLICE CARNAGE ON THE ROADS

Drivers of one of Britain’s largest police forces, Greater Manchester Police, are involved in so many accidents the entire fleet of vehicles has switched its insurance cover from fully comprehensive to third party saving £1 million.

The force averages three accidents a day and over a twelve-month period were directly the cause of four deaths.

The Metropolitan Police (London) recorded 6,324 accidents over the same period, an increase from 6,154 the previous 12 months. It boasted that none had resulted in a fatality.

COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE POLICE SOAR

Greater Manchester Police – Chief Constable David Wilmot says racism is now being treated as seriously as rape or murder – has hit the ‘complaints against the police’ top spot. A total of 974 complaints were registered, higher than any other area in the country.

West Midlands came second (911) followed by Merseyside (822) and Sussex (717). Greater Manchester Police also recorded the highest number of assault complaints.

‘JURY DISTRUST OF POLICE FUELS RISE IN ACQUITTALS’

More and more suspected criminals are going free because juries no longer trust the police, according to research. The acquittal rate in crown court trials has soared from 32 per cent in the mid-1970s to 43 per cent today.

Experts say miscarriages of justice such as the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six have made jurors less likely to believe the word of police and lawyers.

In these cases – the subjects of successful appeals in the early 1990s – it was shown that crucial evidence had been withheld from the defence and some confessions had been held under duress.

Dr. Gary Slapper of the Open University who carried out the research said there was growing cynicism among jurors: "Even fifty years ago people automatically believed the word of a public official,’ he said. Now they may be more suspicious of them’

Despite the problems, however, he warned Home Secretary Jack Straw against pressing ahead with cost-cutting plans to limit the right of defendants to opt for jury trial. He said: ‘If juries are doubtful about whether the police and lawyers are telling the truth, the way to tackle that is not to limit the role of juries but deal with the credibility of the legal system.’

FORMER SPY REVEALS MI5 CONSPIRACY TO GAOL INNOCENT MEN

David Shayler, the former security service spy arrested for revealing corruption, illegal activity and the denial of civil liberties by MI5 has confessed that events have left him ‘ashamed to be British’.

Recently, the appeal of two Palestinians convicted of bombing the Israeli Embassy in London, was stopped after a document was disclosed. It revealed that MI5 had advance notice of the ‘terrorist’ attack and showed someone else was responsible for carrying it out.

On past experience it is assumed that the ‘someone else’ was Mossad (Israeli Secret Service) agents, ‘attacking’ their own embassy. This is common practice. These bogus attacks serve several purposes; evidence is planted to suggest the involvement of nuisance Arab activists who are then falsely charged and imprisoned. It also increases security of Jewish targets at British taxpayers expense, engenders sympathy for Israel, causes apathy towards the Palestinian cause, and justifies Israeli terrorism.

Both the government and its half-Jewish Home Secretary, Jack Straw, denied the document’s existence but three years of detective work finally disclosed the incriminating evidence of government and MI5 complicity in what is likely to be a Jewish plot and outrage.

Shayler added: "It took three years for this document to be disclosed while two quite probably innocent people languished in prison. It is a disgraceful affront to our supposedly free and democratic society. Without this document, these people did not have a fair trial. Without it they would never have even got an appeal but remained on the wrong end of a 20-year gaol term."

PLACING THE LAW BEFORE CORRUPTED DUTY

The former spy conceded that he had a duty of confidentiality but surmised that, ‘As a British subject I also had a life-long duty to the laws of the land.’

Astonishingly, this poacher turned gamekeeper revealed that MI5 knew that another group not connected to the Palestinians was involved. Although MI5 was aware of this they failed to act on that information; they could even have prevented the attack in the first place but chose not to do so. This amounts to complicity in a likely act of Jewish inspired terrorism.

Running scared, the officer involved tried to hide the incriminating document in the cupboard of a fellow officer, to deflect blame from himself.

David Shayler described how the British government used the secrecy laws to prevent the document being revealed despite knowing that it contained the proof that the gaoled Palestinians were innocent and should be immediately released and compensated.

BRITISH PLOT TO KILL PRESIDENT OF ALGERIA

Revelations that Britain’s MI5 was behind a plot to assassinate the Algerian leader, Colonel Gadaffi, is evidence that the British government, in defiance of international law, is prepared to act as an accomplice to Israel’s terrorist Jihad (war).

Jason Lewis, a journalist working on the tabloid Mail on Sunday, quoted former spy David Shayler: "We may not like Colonel Gadaffi but to arrange his murder is a crime. We supposedly live in a free country under the rule of law, but this is a case of people wanting to ignore those laws when it suits them."

One can just imagine the headline furore if evidence was discovered that the Algerian leader’s security services has hatched a plot to assassinate Prime Minister Tony Blair or US President Bush. NATO jets would now be blasting Libya’s capital Tripoli.

If Britain behaves like a terrorist state then it has no right to protest when other states respond accordingly; a fitting obituary perhaps for the unfortunate victims of the Lockerbie Pan Am Boeing 747 tragedy on December 21^st 1988.

Facts Without The Spin - Michael Walsh