 |
 |
|
|
MICHAEL WALSH NEWS DESK - 30 NOVEMBER 2000
OFFICIAL: BRITAIN IS NOW A POLICE STATE
A DAMNING INDICTMENT OF
BRITAIN’S CORRUPT POLICE SERVICE
That Britain is a Police State is not so much an exaggeration as an interpretation of the facts. Michael Walsh with thirty years experience dealing with the police in a public, professional and social capacity; even as a political prisoner says it would be difficult to argue otherwise.
Just as circumstances have combined to give our parliamentary system a quasi-dictatorship status, Britain’s police forces now have much in common with East Germany’s notorious Stasi Police.
Of course there are supinely largely law-abiding citizens in all countries naïve enough to believe their ‘bobbies’ are paragons of virtue. A few rookie policemen may be but not so the majority, the jaded and hardened ‘heard-it-all-before’ coppers.
Sadly, here as in other Police States, most people slavishly abide by the regime’s laws and turn a blind eye to state abuse no matter how unjust it is to themselves and their fellow citizens. Although they themselves are beneficiaries of some civil liberties achieved by past social reformers and rebels, they regard their modern counterparts as ‘boat-rockers’.
BIRDS IN A NOT SO GILDED CAGE
People are free only in the sense that a caged bird is. Intellectually they are free to fly anywhere - within the cage. The bird having never known real freedom thinks ‘this is it. Wow!’
In tax terms they work for the state for seven months a year and never question their being state-mugged. They would probably scream blue murder if an Adolf came along threatening to take four months work-taxes off them, little realising they were better off by three months wages and the cage was going to be cleaned up and extended!
Like the budgie they perform, are fed and compared with their masters enjoy a life of sorts. Like the caged bird they think, ‘this is it. Wow!’ They never have the imagination to see beyond the bars, never question imposed limitations or the squalor that surrounds them. Their cage hasn’t been properly cleaned or managed for years!
But Rebels against State injustice are Nature’s truly free men and women. They know there is greater freedom outside the bars of state control and they constantly batter their wings against the bars. They not only preach free expression; they practice it. This often brings them into conflict with the (police) state.
"Britain’s is a government under which the senior jobs in say, the police and so many other areas of public life, go to those who are resolutely ‘on message.’
Major-General Julian Thompson, Commander 3rd Commando Brigade, Falklands War
GOOD LAW AND BAD LAW
The first essential of free men and women is to rid themselves of the illusion that state functionaries and in particular the police do so ‘by consent of the people’. Police Forces are there to enforce laws made by a tiny unrepresentative clique of democracy dodging political careerists whose primary purpose is to maintain power by excluding their radical opposition, the cage-rattlers.
Of course there are laws that benefit everyone and these laws must be kept without question. They apply everywhere regardless of political regime. We drive by the rules of the road, we don’t steal other people’s money or property, deprive others of their freedom, use violence against others, cheat and lie, impose taxes. (We have governments to do all that!).
Such laws apply in all ordered societies. But the Police State emerges from the intellectual swamp when it complies with state introduced laws specifically designed to 1. Deny the people the right to question state policies. 2. Remove the means to achieve democratic change through free expression. 3. Deny or impede activities that might threaten the government.
NOT RACE RELATIONS
BUT PROTECTION FROM THE PEOPLES’ REVOLT
Perfect examples of bad law are those sections of the Public Order Act relating to ‘race relations’. Of course the law should apply equally to all regardless of race or creed. Such laws, victors’ propaganda aside, existed even in Hitler’s Germany.
But the British regime’s notorious race laws are not designed to provide equal rights to all citizens but to provide unequal rights for some citizens. 1. They deny the host population (White European British) the right to discriminate in favour of their own kind. 2. They make it a criminal offence to criticise or resist the government’s immigration and race-mixing policies. 3. These laws are riddled with political twaddle that exempt non-whites from compliance. The regime’s race ‘relations’ laws are blatantly racist.
Britain’s race laws would contravene human rights wherever they were imposed. In old Australia and South Africa similar laws weighed in favour of the White population once attracted international outrage and trade embargoes.
BRITISH APARTHEID FAVOURS COLOUREDS
The British regimes’ immigration and race relations policy is undeniably racist, which is why it needs to be protected by loophole-law and cant, a politically corrupted police force and a selected judiciary that is ‘on message’. Its propaganda wing is called the ‘provisional educational establishment’.
"England is the land of consummate cant." - Friedrich Nietsche
It favours the immigration of some races and excludes others. Aliens receive vast sums of taxpayers’ money for purposes exclusive to their race requirements, a privilege denied to the host population. They are allowed to discriminate in favour of their own kind in all areas including employment, promotional prospects, education and freedom of expression.
In Liverpool (hardly unique) a blacks only college receives an annual grant of £300,000. Could you imagine the likely fate of any Briton who cheekily applied for a similar grant for a college restricted to white teachers and students!
Bill Gates gives Cambridge University £150,000,000 on condition that scholarships will be available only to foreign graduates. Can you imagine the hysteria if such a donation be made exclusively for homegrown Britons? Would not such a grant be racist? Evidently it isn’t racist to discriminate against whites.
Equality in these and other areas are denied the indigenous population. The British regime’s imposed discrimination that favours non-Whites is South Africa’s apartheid in reverse. Britain is now one of the racist countries in the world but uniquely it is a racism weighed against the host population.
CHILDREN IMPRISONED IN BRITAIN
Britain is one of the few countries in the world where aliens, with government aid and assistance, may libel and discriminate against the host population. It is one of the few countries in the world where a native-born citizen, even a child, can be imprisoned for 1. Expressing preference for its own kind 2. For criticising or rejecting government policy.
These are facts and the police, the judicial system and the prisons are the state functionaries who impose the regime’s iniquitous racist laws. I would like to see anyone argue otherwise.
THE POLICEMAN APPLIES THE REGIME’S LAW?
A policeman or woman is a functionary of the regime with a mindset quite different from your regular guy. As with other occupations the police service attracts a certain type of person whose psychological makeup is preconditioned for the role.
The job tends to attract the school bully I know best type who can and will abuse their authority. As a consequence most citizens are apprehensive when they come into contact with the police, they are submissive and most people have experienced yobbish police behaviour. How many of us would pull up alongside a traffic policeman and ask him the time or for directions?
The policeman obediently serves the state and never questions their paymasters or their methods. Their role requires them to suspend moral judgement. They and the judiciary are required to regularly attend brainwashing courses to ensure understanding and compliance with the regime’s politically correct directives.
They rarely live with ordinary people and quickly adopt a ‘them and us’ psychosis, the public being the ‘them’ people.
In many ways they lack public support, confidence and respect so they tend to have a chip on their shoulder. It is not unknown for policemen to be physically attacked while onlookers cheer their attackers on. When policemen are attacked they rarely find witnesses to support the prosecution. Even their wives don’t like them; the police figure among the highest when it comes to divorce statistics. For these reasons there are few people attracted to the job so it needs to be a job with high pay and substantial perks.
HAPPY HOOKERS FAST-TRACKING FOR A BOBBY’S JOB
Policemen receive subsidised housing and access to a wealth of benefits such as private health schemes, mortgages, pensions and related perks. Their jobs are protected far more than others; redundancy is unheard of and they are extremely well paid. Their status as state functionaries gives them easier access to various opportunities and they are a law unto themselves.
They have virtually unlimited sick pay leave which doesn’t actually require them to be sick in the accepted sense. Could you imagine a builder’s labour taking five months ‘stress leave’ on full pay because he was the butt of a colleague’s humour?
Talking of butts, a policewoman’s butt can earn her considerably more than a hooker’s butt. All it needs is for a colleague to comment on her derriere and she is in line for a mega compensation claim. See, she doesn’t even need to work at it!
Now that the Metropolitan Police propose recruiting convicted criminals to fill job vacancies we can expect a flood of applications from happy hookers fast tracking to riches unheard of not to mention a fat pension usually denied to their sisterhood.
It also dispenses with the need to program officers in the psycho-somersaulting skills needed to suspend moral judgement or instil a feeling of shame.
THEIR OWN JUDGE AND JURY
Although their work is hardly physical and they are often desk or car bound they somehow manage to get sick or injured at a far greater rate than the self-employed who do work long arduous hours at real personal and financial risk.
The policeman wears a smart (free) uniform or gets clothing allowance. They judge their own performance and promotion comes through their colleagues. As if that isn’t enough they take early retirement on a pension that exceeds most persons working salaries.
Despite the advantages of being self-policed they still manage to disproportionately find themselves in the company of those criminals they do manage to catch.
Although they go through life psychologically programmed to crack down hard on those foolish enough to break society’s rules, and remember it was a policeman who coined the phrase, ‘zero tolerance’, they themselves are quite incapable of abiding by the rules.
EVEN FOOTBALL HOOLIGANS ARE BETTER BEHAVED
Despite their renowned professional arrogance policemen disproportionately find themselves on the receiving end of justice. Recently more than a quarter of the Old Bailey’s courts were trying cases involving members of the Metropolitan Police. The unrelated charges ranged from corruption to aggravated assault. - Daily Mail 22 November 2000.The Untouchables?
Could you imagine more than a quarter of any courts hearing cases involving say, professional electricians, bus drivers or bank tellers? Even football hooligans are better behaved!
The policeman will send a teenager to a hellhole of a prison for six months for stealing a pack of razor blades. The same policeman can see nothing immoral in taking five months sick leave (stress! Hmmm) while plundering the taxpayers purse because a colleague made a joke about him at a police function. What did I tell you about suspended morality?
THEY CAN DISH IT BUT CAN’T TAKE IT
Policemen have been known to take their own lives because their sensitivities have been hurt. These same sensitive souls have sent relatively good and innocent men and women to prison, bringing immense suffering to them and their families. Bit like the Soviet gulags really.
It is a fact that young men and women today are more likely to be on the receiving end of summary ‘policeman’s law’ than the victim of otherwise criminal behaviour. In fact few people have been the victims of criminal activity but most can tell a tale about police harassment, bullying or worse. There is hardly a Briton who hasn’t had their purse or their pocket state-raided by a fine imposed for an ‘offence’ that would not be an offence in more civilised societies.
Young men won’t necessarily feel threatened by young men but they will feel apprehensive should the approaching men be in police uniform. It is the same for law-abiding motorists. Policemen, especially traffic policemen, repel them.
COWARDS WHO LOCK UP CHILDREN
All too often the policeman’s victim is treated less compassionately than he might expect from your more traditional thug. I remember a burly policeman physically locking a fifteen-year old schoolboy (in law still a child) and his professional mother in a police cell in the depths of a police station basement.
Why? The young lad happened to be with a group of older guys who were teasing other youths. When the ribbing proceeded to several blows being struck the fifteen- year old did precisely what any reasonable person would recommend him to do in the circumstances – he scampered. But because he had been in the older boys’ company he was charged under the catch-all ‘affray’ and risks months of detention in a prison system so cruel that it has been condemned as the most inhuman in Europe. As critics say, if they locked animals up in similar conditions they would be prosecuted.
Can you think of any criminal other than a psychotic outcast who could do such a thing to a child? It beggars belief! It also begs the question, if policemen can do as they do - even to children, is there anything at all that they might recoil from? It is doubtful.
OUR PSYCHOTIC POLICE SERVICE
The Greater Manchester Police report that ‘stress’ otherwise classed as ‘psychological disorder’ accounted for nearly a fifth (20%) of the force’s 21,461 days lost in a twelve month period.
One of the most senior officers to take extended leave as a result of stress was Chief Inspector Colin Grant. He took five months sick leave after learning he had been the butt of a joke at a police dinner in his absence." – Daily Mail, 21 November 2000.
Incidentally it was the David Wilmot, Chief Constable of this same police force who proudly admitted that ‘racist crime was now being treated as seriously as rape or murder’. Some might be forgiven for feeling that Chief Constable David Wilmot likewise suffers from ‘psychological disorder’.
A JOB TO KILL FOR – AND THEY DO!
For a certain type of person the policeman’s career is a job to kill for and they will literally do precisely that. Many an innocent man has been gaoled and prematurely died in prison; reported cases are the tip of an iceberg. Before hanging was abolished those they wished to remove were hanged. God forbid that capital punishment should ever be re-introduced to Britain where there have been so many dubious convictions, a state where they gaol children and senior citizens for crying: ‘England first!’
It is estimated that 10% of Britain’s prisoners are innocent of the crime for which they were gaoled; police and magistrates conveniently bin them as ‘social undesirables’. A large minority of Britain’s prisoners are gaoled for offences that can be linked directly to a failed educational system or/and being deprived of education in areas of social responsibility.
They have been weaned on a system of corruption that doesn’t stop at the barred gates of Downing Street. They are television-fed a non-stop daily diet of depravity. Their ‘heroes’ are criminals; a state the police are openly regarded as corrupt.
You have heard of ‘economic immigrants’ and of how every sinew of the state is brought to their assistance? Might we then remember that Britain’s prisons are filled with the economically deprived who are denied the hand-up rather than the handout?
Those of us who rattle the cage know well that in a better managed more just society these unfortunates would not be in a prison at all.
Taking the Judas silver: But the policeman protects the state and defends the state against the predicable consequences of mismanagement, financial corruption and the looting of honest endeavour through taxation. Policemen can always be relied upon to carry out tasks that even infantrymen baulk at. For his reward the state protects the policeman. In biblical times they called it the Judas silver.
SAY WHAT YOU LIKE, AS LONG AS YOU’RE BLACK
The police backed by the courts have but one purpose, to impose the minority regime’s law. Furthermore they work to Government guidelines and manipulate loopholes to ensure that these laws are selective in their application.
Typically rap ‘artists’ expressing the worst kind of anti-White racist and subversive lyrics are financially subsidised and promoted, fast-tracked up the fraudulent popular music charts whilst young white people are given heavy gaol sentences for mildly expressing criticism of their government’s immigration policy or the tragedies that result from it.
Books, newspapers and magazines that promote White values and interests are libelled as ‘racist’ and denied retail outlets. Their writers and publishers run the risk of heavy fines or imprisonment whilst publications promoting ethnic ‘minority’ interests are subsidised, promoted and given free publicity.
Colleges and educational opportunities, entertainment and cultural events, exclusively for coloureds, are funded by the predominantly White rate and taxpayers yet White people are denied similar separate facilities and opportunities. You know it as (ant-White) racism; your minority government and its apparatchik lickspittle foot soldiers refer to it as positive discrimination.
High street newsagents promote newspapers and magazines specifically aimed at ethnic groups other than white. These publications consistently libel the White race, denigrating its achievements, all of which bring benefits to non-whites of course. The same publications carry racist propaganda urging race purity for their own kind, and of course extol the virtues of their own promoted racial group. The difference being is that the ethnic groups promoted are non-white.
The monstrous administrators of these racist iniquities are the police and the courts. It is therefore the moral and patriotic duty of all White citizens to work towards White racial equality with coloureds and to expose racism wherever it rears its ugly head. The first place to look is your local police station and the rest can be found in any national or local government office. It is the duty of all cage rattlers to resist and protect themselves and their people from a police force that deals with one race more favourably than another.
APPLYING THE LAW SELECTIVELY
Recently a Chief Constable said that He had decided that the selling and use of soft drugs would be disregarded. You know what they call a system where the police decide on the hoof what is and isn’t criminal? It is called a Police State. Welcome to Britain.
The Police therefore will decide that ‘he won’t be charged because he is coloured’ and that is a ‘mitigating social circumstance’. The white person will be charged because he doesn’t have any mitigating circumstances.
You have the ‘peace of mind’ of knowing that what is an offence in say one police region is not an offence in another; or worse, it depends on the colour of your skin, your career (the Home Secretary’s police driver) or your dad’s job (Tony Blair’s son’s drunkenness).
"The thing that staggers me is that the police said there was nothing to investigate. But Karen on her own amassed a substantial amount of information." Colm O’Gorman of the child protection charity ‘One in Four’ commenting on police in-action when provided with overwhelming evidence of paedophilia.
Reading the newspapers each day there is outrage at selective application of the law. Typically one senior citizens writes: "What I can’t understand is this: If I were to park my car on waste land, or for that matter any side street in the city, I would be clamped and left with a hefty bill to get my car back." The elderly gentleman was referring to tinkers being given free rein to destroy his neighbourhood.
It is reported that: "A man who downloaded child pornography from the Internet has been spared a prison sentence because the judge believes imprisonment would be ‘an easy option. Instead he was given two years probation."
This same judge who freed a man guilty of possessing child pornography, David Wyn Morgan, in 1979 gave the British Movement’s Leader Michael McLaughlin, six four-month prison sentences for publishing leaflets opposing the government’s political foreign policy record and immigration policies.
The leaflets had been distributed over many years without a single complaint being levelled at the publisher. A Home Office Government newssheet commented on the case before it was even heard. You still think we don’t live in a police state?
THE POLICE PROTECT OMAGH BOMBING TERRORISTS
Recently the ‘Real IRA’ held a fund-raising meeting in the upstairs room of the Cock Tavern near Euston Station in London. This terrorist group is reliably believed to be behind the worst single atrocity committed against peace time civilians when it planted a bomb in the market town of Omagh, which resulted in the agonizing deaths of 29 shoppers, many of them children; and the maiming of hundreds more.
Hardly surprisingly distressed families of their victims gathered outside to picket the fund-raising event at the Cock Tavern. Donna-Maria Barker holding a picture of her 12-year old son, James, stood in tears on a chair and said: "I feel so angry."
Elizabeth Gibson whose 36-year old sister Esther died in the attack sobbed as she unsuccessfully asked the pub’s landlords to have them ‘thrown them out.’
The dinghy upstairs room upstairs was festooned with Republican and Marxist propaganda but the police arrived and to the bemusement of the distressed protestors the police ordered them away from the venue. Police officers said: "they had to protect the rights of those holding a private meeting inside."
This is the same police force that for decades denied peaceful white protest groups the right to protest. The same police force that cordoned off buildings and roads to prevent private (white interest) meetings and put under surveillance young and old (white) Britons who have never broken the law in their lives.
POLICE TARGET PROTESTING TRUCKERS AND FARMERS
Police treachery! "Elite undercover police have been sent into action against fuel protestors, it emerged yesterday." Ray Massey and Peter Rose, journalists for the Daily Mail described how Special Branch officers posed as truckers and farmers to infiltrate meetings.
The report went on to say that phone lines will have been tapped and high-tech equipment used to eavesdrop on mobiles. E-mails will also have been monitored in the lead-up to protests against Europe’s highest taxation regime. "It is thought to be the first time since the seamen’s strike of the mid-60s that a Labour Government has launched such a large scale surveillance operation against its own citizens"
- Daily Mail, November 1 2000
"ASHAMED TO BE BRITISH."
Branches of Britain’s police services are masters of the black arts of subversion, black propaganda, terrorism; even the murder of Heads of State of other countries. Former MI5 agent David Shayler is to give evidence that the British security services was behind a plot to assassinate Libyan dictator Colonel Gadaffi. The former spy said: "We may not like Colonel Gadaffi but to arrange his murder is a crime. We supposedly live in a free country under the rule of law, but this is a case of people (the police) wanting to avoid those laws when it suits them."
A reformed secret policeman, David Shayler who blew the whistle on state-inspired terrorism said: "This last week has left me feeling ashamed to be British. Perhaps some people believe I ought to be ashamed, that I betrayed my country by revealing what went on during my time in the security service.
"INCOMPETENCE AND (POLICE)
DISREGARD FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES"
"But I went on record because of the incompetence and disregard for civil liberties I saw during my daily duties." He added.
Going on to describe how two young Palestinians were stitched up by the security service he said: "These people did not have a fair trial. Without it (a document the government had denied having) they would never even have got an appeal but would have remained on the wrong end of a 20-year gaol term."
THEY EVEN SPY ON THEIR OWN SOVEREIGN
The monstrous Whitehall regime in its North Korean paranoia even spies on its own sovereign: "Last night, royal sources confirmed that Prince Charles was aware of the (state) surveillance. He has now installed a secure telephone network that does not rely on the official government system to protect his privacy." –Daily Mail.
BRITAIN NOW LIKE A SOVIET BLOC POLICE STATE
Undeniably Britons are treated as unjustly as were the working class peoples of the former Soviet Union and its European slave states. Britain has the largest gaol population in Europe; it is a prison system that without question is the most degrading in the developed world.
It has the highest number of prison suicides and gaol-crime including male rape. Worst of all it houses a prison population of whom are significant minority would not be there
1. If they were other than White
2. Enjoyed the same freedom of expression and protest as are enjoyed in other countries.
3. Were not victims of a state judiciary that has been labelled as politically correct and corrupt?
4. Are victims of poverty and moral decay the cause of which lies firmly at the doorstep of No.10 Downing Street.
THE BOTTOM LINE
So, Michael you might ask, how come in a Police State you are allowed to write this stuff? Why? Because I haven’t hit the ‘send’ button yet! Watch what happens when I do.
Why not put it to the test. Print this off or download it; distribute it – go on, if you’re not living in a Police State what have you got to be afraid of? I am not scared, are you? Go on hit that ‘send’ button – now!
Michael Walsh