Following the arrest of over one hundred opponents of the Westminster government’s immigration and racial policies, those still loyal to their European race are being urged to reject outmoded sentimental baggage that the police act ‘by consent’

The police have no democratically lawful mandate to arrest, question or charge Britons for activities that in civilised countries are an accepted and essential part of the democratic process. For activities which, if put to the test in a referendum, would be rejected by the majority of indigenous Britons.

Those arrested by the Blair regime’s police will have been questioned, maybe charged, under the quasi-legal race relations section of the Public Order Act. Without question this racially offensive undemocratic Act will be repealed when democratic and civil rights are returned to our disenfranchised population. Therefore Britons must not regard this section of the Act as the law.

THE POLITICAL POLICE

These police swoops have several purposes behind them. To intimidate the politically active, to discourage recruits, to discredit patriots, to remove opposition to the Blair regime’s immigration policy, and to take advantage of a parliamentary Act that will soon be swept aside by the imposition of the forthcoming European Bill of Human Rights. This will make it much more difficult for the police to question, harass and charge those who they consider have committed a political offence.

ADVICE FOR THE POLITICALLY PERSECUTED

Keep silent! Never allow yourself to be questioned by the police. Do not answer their questions. You have the right to maintain silence. Why is this important?

Years ago a very senior policeman conceded that no more than a handful of murderers would have been hanged in the 20^th Century – if they had kept their mouths shut. If you refuse to answer their questions you cannot incriminate yourself, you cannot give them clues to assist them further, they cannot win your confidence (which will be abused).

If you refuse to answer questions it is down to them to prove that you committed the offence with which you are being questioned or charged. Let me tell you that this is virtually impossible to do.

To give you an example I will use a rather indelicate real life example. A coloured assailant raped a young woman. He denied rape but admitted only sexual assault, which is deemed a lesser offence. Though unquestionably the victim experienced pain and discomfort during the attack there was no physical proof of penetration and she (surprise, surprise) couldn’t confirm that she actually witnessed the penetrative act. It was an un-provable offence. He got off with it.

In another case a printer was surrounded with the evidence of his political ‘crime’. The printing plates and false documents were everywhere. Caught red-handed you might say but no, he simply expressed surprise. He said that his workshop was a sort of commune, people were always coming and going, doing their own thing. Someone else must have done the printing.

The police therefore would have to prove beyond all reasonably doubt that the printer had actually not only printed the documents but had actually distributed them. It isn’t necessarily an offence to print material; the offence is often in the publishing (passing them around). That was impossible to prove, within police resources anyway. No further action was taken.

A young man was arrested for fly-posting. He got off with it because he swore blind that he was actually trying to remove the poster and thought the paste contained a removing agent. Another posted a letter – but it couldn’t be proved (beyond all reasonable doubt) that he had posted it. He might have got something off his chest by writing it down (which isn’t an offence) then lost it. Someone else thinking they were doing him a favour then posted it. They not him committed the offence of publishing it. Get my drift?

Let us imagine, Blair’s police burst in and grab your PC and floppy discs; hard copy that is lying around. Again they have got to prove (beyond all reasonable doubt) that it is your computer, you alone have access to it, you actually put that stuff on it, and essentially you published (distributed) it by making it available to others.

Unless you admit an offence or say anything that assists them the police have an impossible task to prove your responsibility. Furthermore the offence if there is applies only within British borders.

You could be writing for the American or even a Russian audience which has absolutely nothing to do with any British police force. (I refuse to call them a police ‘service’). As another example you may be curbed under the restrictions of the notorious Race Relations Act from having a spoken or written opinion on racial differences - but only within this country’s borders.

For instance you may not be allowed to pass comment on the activities of coloured people in Britain but there is no law that prevents you from commenting on the activities of coloureds who live say in Africa.

KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT

If you are questioned, arrested or charged by the police do not say anything. You are not obliged to. It is up to them to prove you did break the law (impossible), not for you to prove you didn’t (quite easy). Don’t stick your own neck in the noose and you will find that they won’t get your neck in it either.

One final tip. Visit your local left-wing bookshop. Here you will find all sorts of leftie printed material offering advice on how to evade prosecution. What to do if you are questioned arrested or gaoled. Pick them up and read them. The one piece of good news is that the law (and its restraints) apply equally to you as they do to the revolutionaries of the far left.