![]() |
![]() |
MICHAEL WALSH PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICE
5th January 2001
EUROPE IN DARKNESS AGAIN
The lights of learning are once again going out over Europe. The Aryan continents liberal elite, financed and influenced by the powerful Jewish lobby, has reacted furiously to the liberating potential of the Internet. The Internet has now breached the publishers closed shop. As a consequence books, magazines, and revisionist material previously denied to the general public are now accessible through the worlds biggest bookstore; a store that wont tolerate the states security guards at its entrance.
Thanks to the Internet Hitlers controversial appraisal of National Socialism, Mein Kampf (My Struggle) www.ety.com/HRP has now entered the bestseller lists throughout Europe. Ironically it is now set to reclaim its position as the 20th Century's best selling book after the Holy Bible.
The first section of Michael Walshs acclaimed Witness to History, which in a single volume demolishes the allies 2nd World War propaganda, is now partly online as are hundreds of books previously placed in intellectual purgatory by Europes liberal apparatchiks. Such books like the spy catchers expose of British corruption were formerly freely available only in the more open American market.
BRITAINS BOOK BURNING IS JUDICIAL
Throughout history various governments have censored information. The only example of a popular uprising against licence was in Hitlers Germany. Following a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels (10th May 1933) the nation gathered up masses of pornographic, communist, seditious and anti-German publications and burnt them at public bonfires attended by enthusiastic patriots. Interestingly Germanys student population initiated the book burning. Thousands of university students, fired by the ministers speech, formed a torchlight procession and entered the Unter den Linden Square opposite Berlin University to light bonfires which sent the signal across Germany.
INFORMATION IS WESTS No.1 TARGET
Most book burnings however have been less popular. America whilst more liberal than its European allies doesnt hesitate to use hi-tech weaponry to eliminate freedom of speech. A key target during the war against Serbia was Radio Television Serbia, the timing of which was set to maximise not only damage to the building but to inflict the highest number of civilian broadcasting civilians.
It would have been just as easy to hit the stations transmitters without loss of life. Other stations targeted and attacked included Kosava Radio housing the Pink and BK TV transmitters whose broadcasts were aimed at the youth of Serbia. These attacks were described as an attack on free speech. Miodrag Ilic of the Serbian Broadcasting Group described the attacks as, a deadly strike to democracy and the beginning of world slavery.
THE STATE v. JORDAN/HANCOCK
The British regime, protecting its pro-immigration agenda by using the Race Relations Act, uses the politically correct and indoctrinated courts to silence dissenters. Michael Walsh the writer and poet was gaoled for four months for publishing a leaflet criticising British policy in what was then Rhodesia. He was one of several hundred British dissidents who over the past two decades have been fined or gaoled for publishing material critical of British government policy.
These tragedies aimed at strangling dissent and free speech have been carefully censored by the popular press. Like the media in the old Soviet Union it has anaesthetised the public into thinking that they enjoy free speech in Britain. Those gaoled, often in animal-like conditions, include elected leaders of other political parties and organisations democratically opposed to the parliamentary dictates of Westminster. Mr. John Tyndall, Mr Colin Jordan and the dowager Lady Jane Birdwood, an enfeebled octogenarian have all been imprisoned.
SHOOTING THE MESSENGER
Furious that despite handing out prison terms to intellectual dissenters, published material persists in appearing, the British regime is now hitting back by targeting and prosecuting printers of material critical of the government policy. On the 9th March 2001 the aged and politically impotent Colin Jordan will be brought before a Leeds court on charges relating to his work, Merry England 2000 which is an interesting though stifling intellectual essay on modern England. Published many years ago and hardly likely to set the radical right aflame it is however, by British government standards, critical of the consequences of immigration.
The booklet is already available online at www.faem.com It is not however the intention of the Blair regime to silence Jordan but to use this court case as a prototype to intimidate general printers of material considered critical of the regime.Blair is well known in journalistic circles as being Peter Mandelson's 'Bum Boy' the sinister jew who guided Blair to his current position in more ways then one.
PRINTER ON TRIAL
Standing with Jordan in the Leeds court dock is Mr. Anthony Hancock, the Brighton-based printer with an unequalled reputation for supplying the needs of businesses throughout the United Kingdom. and offering a no censorship printing service. Mr Hancock has been charged as a co-defendant simply because Jordans booklet was allegedly printed at the firms unit. If found guilty the consequences for both freedom of information and the printing profession as a whole would be nothing short of calamitous. In effect it would make every printer in the United Kingdom legally responsible for the content and distribution (United Kingdom) of printed material. This is of course a physical and legally impossibility. No printer could be expected to read through every book, pamphlet or magazine brought to him for printing and then decide if it were legal or not. Furthermore he could not (nor could the publisher) be expected to offer a legal opinion prior to print because in the end it will be a court and jury that will decide whether material is illegal or not. How could a printer separate the legal from the illegal if the highest paid lawyers in the land cannot do so prior to a case being heard?
A FRIGHTENING AND SERIOUS ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH
This quiet and insidious development has been described as one of the most frightening and serious attacks against freedom of expression in British history. It is far more draconian than the infamous denial of information brought in as a necessity during both world wars.
Printers throughout the country are now being put on red alert to monitor this potentially disastrous development and to resist the governments attempt to strangle free speech before it goes through the general printers door. No printer in the country can be held responsible for the subsequent publication of material he prints.
If for instance the reader of a crime novel was inspired by a particular crime and carried out such a crime would the books printer be similarly charged? It would mean that printers of pornographic material would stand in the dock with the pornographers publishers. If a printer were to print educational certificates in good faith and afterwards learn that they had been put to false use he too could be charged?
If he were to print leaflets advertising a fete that was later cancelled could he be sued? Is this end of the road for general printing, the Internet of its time and a form of communication that brought Europe out of medieval darkness? If so then Europe and in particular Britain, have been plunged into darkness once again. The trial is set to commence at Leeds on March the 9th any suggestions or information which might help will be gratefully received,meanwhile please ciculate this message as widely as possible. The Michael Walsh News Desk
"THE RIGHT TO KNOW IS LIKE THE RIGHT TO LIVE. IT IS FUNDAMENTAL AND UNCONDITIONAL."
(George Bernard Shaw, Nobel-Prize-Laureate 1925)