NEWS DESK MICHAEL WALSH, 4th March 2001

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL DAMNS ISRAEL’S CHILD MURDERERS

Israel has shrugged off the US State Department’s annual report which accuses Israel of using excessive force since the renewed Palestinian uprising broke out last September. The unusually (for America) harsh criticism of Israeli policy placed Israel in a group of evil countries notorious as being the world’s worst human rights offenders. The report stated that Israeli security forces had deliberately targeted for assassination many Palestinians merely for being hostile to Israel’s occupation.

It added that Israel had ‘committed numerous serious human rights abuses during the year, in the occupied territories killing 307 civilians (the figure has now passed 400) and injuring a further 11,300, of whom most are protesting Arab children.’

The US State Department’s Report coincided with Amnesty International’s findings which accused Israel of sponsoring ‘state assassination’ against Palestinians and of using ‘excessive, random or negligent use of force.’

The latter alludes to Israeli Security Forces using American-supplied rifles and sniper sights to randomly kill protesting children as a warning to stone-throwing youths. Avoiding the words genocide or holocaust but coming very close to it, the internationally respected human rights organisation demanded that Israel ‘put an end to its liquidation policy.’

The London-based organisation added that it had examined several cases of ‘extra judicial execution.’ This refers to the Israeli practice of kidnapping Palestinians, even children, and torturing them to death as a policy of striking terror into the occupied Palestinian population.

Amnesty International said that some of those murdered in cold blood ‘could easily have been arrested.’ The report revealed that in one tragic case ‘five (Israeli) soldiers standing only six feet away deliberately and in cold-blood shot dead an unarmed taxi driver and father, Hani Abu Bakri in the Gaza strip.

The report added: ‘Not only could the soldiers have arrested him but they appeared to have no qualms about aiming their fire randomly at a mini bus full of ordinary people.’

Bakri was killed outright, another Palestinian was mortally wounded and the murderous and unaccountable Jewish assassination squad permanently disabled another. D.J Schneeweiss, spokesman for the Israeli Embassy in London flared up saying that the human rights body’s report was ‘reprehensible.’

Jewish contributors to a Home Office-commissioned survey on religious and racist discrimination have protested at increased problems facing their community from across Britain’s social and cultural divide. More than 75% of Jews (Hindu, Muslim and Sikh) students questioned reported hostility that was not confined to what they describe as ‘far right groups’.

Jews complained that even teachers expressed opinions that made them feel uncomfortable, such as reminding classes that it was the Jews who killed Jesus Christ. Another cause for concern expressed by racial minority groups was that the timing of exams often clashed with their religious festivals.

One Jew protested that though anti-Semitism (he meant anti-Zionist) expression varied throughout Britain it was ‘ingrained everywhere – even with country folk who had never seen a Jew.’ *

One hapless Indian Jew complained of being victim of a barrage of hostility. He reported meeting ‘multiple levels of racism – from white English people for being Indian, from Hindus for being Jewish and from Jews for being black.’

Of those questioned 40% cited racist hostility and 59% highlighted verbal abuse. Neville Nagler, director-general of the Jewish Board of Deputies warmly welcomed the findings. He surmised that ‘we now look forward to continuing our discussions with the government in the light of this latest research.’

This is taken to mean that a satisfactory solution (hardly a final one) to further ‘educate’ the English to be more understanding of the Jews and Israel. It will almost certainly lead to more funds being made available to Jewish and other immigrant groups to coincide with further repression against the host but hostile indigenous population of England.

Note It doesn’t seem to have crossed the mind of the complainant that even yokels read accounts of Jewish ‘soldiers’ deliberately sniping at children who throw stones at them.

Switzerland’s three largest Internet service-providers have blocked access to several hundred web-based organisations hostile to Israel. These include dissenting opinion on matters of race mixing and immigration, and those challenging the exaggerated claims made by Jewish groups pressing for holocaust compensation.

Each of the alpine country’s service providers and website activists where visited by state police. It can be assumed that the police threatened to make life difficult for those who either provide access or express opinion contrary to the official Swiss Government’s line.

Many web sites closed down had questioned Jewish holocaust propaganda, fearing that it is responsible for sucking millions of Swiss francs to Israel and Jewish groups as reparations or bogus compensation. Intimidated, they withdrew their sites fearing imprisonment or worse if they continued to practise their right to disagree with Israel

Samuel Althof, leader of a Jewish minority group calling itself Aktion Kinder des Holocaust (Children of the Holocaust Action Committee) was buoyant at hearing the news: He said his group’s aim was to ‘push the Nazi web-pages off the free service providers. * He added jubilantly: ‘our strategy worked. The dumped Nazi web pages had to look for another host when Yahoo ousted them – it took six months work to find all the pages on the site.’

In what has been described as a Jewish holocaust of the books, Althof boasted that his organisation had managed to block 754 pages critical of Israel or offering alternative opinion to subjects ranging across the political spectrum. Grinning, the Jewish sect leader said: ‘It would require a very good computer brain now to jump these barriers.’

*Jewish groups are notorious for denouncing as ‘Nazi’ any individual or group critical of Jewish interests.

Non-Jews are no better than worms

For further information Michael Walsh

euroman_uk@yahoo.co.uk