hrplogo.gif (11959 Byte)

Q & A


Question and Session Session

   

Q. So why did you first become obsessed with the Holocaust?

A. It's the Zionists and their political lackeys that are obsessed with it.

Q. Why did you become interested in it then?

A. In the late 1970s when opposition to the National Front mushroomed. The various opposition groups - far left, immigrant groups and ‘anti-racists’ united under the Zionist led ‘anti Nazi’ banner with the covert, but enthusiastic support of the British Establishment. They said the "NF were Nazis, that Nazis killed 6 million Jews and that the NF would build gas chambers to kill Jews, coloured people, Republican Irish and homosexuals."

Q. And would you have done given the chance?

A. Don't be absurd! Even if the claims about the ‘Nazis’ were true we grew up in peace time post war Britain - the products of a soft liberal environment so we were hardly to behave like ravening monsters in a post apocalyptic parallel universe. I don't want to gas anybody and I have never met anyone that did. We did want an end to immigration and a start to repatriation though and that was not very popular with the ‘One World flood us with cheap foreign labour and mix 'em all up’ lobby.

Q. Why did so many of the public believe the propaganda?

A. They are mostly not very bright and are brain washed - dumbed down by media propaganda, particularly TV programmes. They want to enjoy all the fruits of materialism without being confronted with awkward questions and ideas that will very probably change their comfortable lives for the worse and destroy their cosy illusions. They do not critically analyse the television they watch. Some of the programmes such as ‘World in Action’ presented grotesque propaganda - they displayed a photo of a map of the NF branches and groups which they announced were to be the sites of proposed gas chambers. This is black propaganda of the type used in the First and Second World Wars. In the First world War British intelligence and media accused the Germans, or Huns as they called emotively them, of bayoneting babies, raping nuns and crucifying prisoners. This was admitted to be a ghastly hoax after the War when US reporters, mainly of Irish and German origin, went to Belgium to investigate.

Q. Why do so many people accept all that is said about the Holocaust so uncritically?

A. It has a very powerful resonance with the public - as belief in orthodox religion has rapidly declined, other - sometimes bizarre beliefs, have come in to replace it. Uncritical belief in Holocaust survivor claims, however grotesque, has helped to fill the void and is now a transcending secular religion which serves to bind gentiles to Jewish groups. This is immensely useful to the Zionist lobby, as it prevents almost all reasoned debate or criticism of Israel, however criminal their treatment of the Palestinians. This is also the reason why Zionist claims are not investigated.

Q. Are you prepared to put a figure on the number that died in the war by gassing, or other methods?

A. No, because Revisionists are not allowed to research the records or the camps in Germany. That alone makes me highly suspicious. We can question the existence of God in the Western World without facing prosecution, or opposition, so why should should this be the one subject beyond debate?

Q. Don't you care about the suffering of the Jews in the War?

A. Yes, I care about people who suffered in the Second World War regardless of their race, religion or creed and I believe this War was a terrible disaster that could have been avoided. I am merely saying their suffering was not unique. Huge numbers of Russians died under Communism from starvation and persecution and then from fighting the Germans. Millions of Germans were killed in the War and millions more were forced out of their homelands by the Red army and deported west in appalling conditions after the War.

Q. So what's all this got to do with modern nationalist parties in Britain, Continental Europe or North America?

A. In theory very little, but the opposition won't let the matter rest. In the UK the BNP were allowed a relatively free run once they abandoned their repatriation policies, opposition to Zionism and interest in World War II revisionism. However, when they won a couple of Euro seats the opposition was again united in hatred. The Equality Commission is currently taking legal action to ensure the BNP has black members under a race law passed in 1976 - so what went wrong with race law enforcement over the last 33 years? In fact the government have reached the stage when they virtually make up the law as they go along when it comes to their political opponents. It's so much quicker and more reliable than trying to steer new laws through both Houses of Parliament.

Q. Why do you think that there has been so little opposition to liberalisation within nationalist parties?

A. Leaders like Gianfranco Fini, the former Italian Fascist, are lured by the prospect of considerable wealth and power and the need to be respectable. Hence they seek to guide their members away from racial nationalism. Nationalists come from liberal, or even extreme liberal societies, so find it difficult to stay outside the main-stream for ever. The revolution from within completes the process begun 30 or more years ago when the public took the ‘easy option’ and voted for Reagan, Thatcher and the rest, rather than seeking the initially much harder nationalist alternative. Now nationalist members and supporters are also mostly falling into line to complete the destruction from within by tolerating some coloured members and miscegentaion.

   


Leaflets Book Shop Main Index