Letters to HRP

Roger,

One last note on your message: For once you are wrong in your belief that a priest or preacher would have his clerical career advanced by trying to stop prison rape.

Prison rape is largely Black on White. Therefore, any effort to remedy this outrage necessarily touches on the race issue.

Race trumps almost everything else. Blacks are near the top in the Liberal food chain. Only Jews outrank them being solidly in food chain position no. 1.

Any priest or preacher raising this issue would severely jeopardize his chances of promotion - and they all know this.

About a year ago someone wrote to leftist Jewess Ann Landers about the problem of prison rape. Ms. Landers, as you know, rarely misses an opportunity to ventilate about rape, domestic violence, etc., since this allows her to attack males (a "perpetrator" group in the liberal scheme of things) on behalf of women (a "victim" group in that same scheme of things and a support group of The Regime).

Even I was surprised to read Ms. Lander's snippy, curt, sneering reply to the letter writer in which she essentially said he and others similarly situated got what they deserved.

Even we "conservatives" (?What are we anyway?) often do not grasp just how mendacious, venal and cruel our liberal enemies are.

Here is a little vignette which occured when you were still just a thought in your father's mind or a twinkle in his eye: You will have heard about the bombing of the Temple in the early '60's in Atlanta.

What you will not have heard is that the Temple bombing occasioned a massive campaign of intimidation and bullying directed at virtually everyone in Atlanta who had vocally opposed race-mixing and/or Israel.

It turned out that the police and I believe the District Attorney's office were already way back then keeping tabs on all such dissidents.

These people were hounded by the police, publicized in the media, accused of being involved, summoned to grand jury deliberations, etc.

One such person - who was later indicted but acquitted - was a guy named "Bright." I did not know him and I forget his first name. He was a wimpy, short, little guy with a limp. I think he was accused by the alcoholic turned government agent of actually carrying the bomb up the driveway of the Temple and planting it, something he was physically incapable of doing to the ultimate disappointment of the prosecutors when the jury acquitted him.

The police raided Bright's house. He lived with his mother in a modest, blue-collar neighborhood.

The police devastated the house and beat up Bright's MOTHER who was a political idiot and not involved or implicated in any of Bright's thought crimes or accused actual crimes.

A journalist named Ben Gunn heard about this and put a picture of Bright's pathetic working class mother on TV showing her beaten black and blue by the police.

The next day he was summoned to the head office and summarily dismissed from the station. He was told that he obviously did not know his job because he did not know what stories were to be publicized and what stories were to be killed. This story of Bright's mother might create sympathy for anti-Semites and would interfere with the important publicity campaign about the Temple bombing.

Gunn was then blacklisted as a journalist. He ultimately got a job when Lester gave him some kind of State job reporting about fishing and hunting (the Game and Fish Report or something like that).

If the situation was already this bad in the Atlanta of the early '60's, it must be at least 30 times worse now.

Any priest or preacher who even touched the jail rape problem would quickly get the Gunn treatment because such a campaign would present a problem for the Establishment line by presenting White males as a "victim" group instead of a "perpetrator" group.

It is important to the Establishment that Whites - especially males but also women when race comes into the picture, since race trumps gender in the Liberal food chain - always be kept in a psychological state of inferiority, guilt and uncertainty.

Hence the incident recently in Cobb County in which a White liberal teacher chided an African-Amercan student for using the word "nigger" and told the students what an ugly word "nigger" was.

As you will recall, the Black parents raised hell that she had used the word "nigger" and demanded and got her removal.

I heard lots of Whites whining that this was "crazy."

It was not "crazy." It made perfectly good sense.

It is important that Whites be made aware that whenever they deal with a Black there is the potential that a "racial incident" may occur and that if that happens the Whites will suffer.

By making an example of this well-meaning silly White cow the Establishment reiterated and reinforced the message to all Whites similarly situated that whenever a White deals with Blacks there is potential for a "racial incident" and that a White person must always be on edge, nervous, deferential and subordinate vis-a-vis the Black.

But all of the above is just the beginning.

You ain't seen nothing yet.

It's going to get better and better.

Sam
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:27 PM

Subject: Re: British Mengeles?